IT’s About Business
· The second question isn’t properly interpreted the way it had to be. Should have mentioned about the concerns such as server protection on a ship etc;
· No proper construction of the sentences.
C1.2-Preetham N Hebbale
· For the second question no suggestion has been given, should have elaborated on the suggestions. Could have included the points such as sharing of annual reports, Profit Loss statements.
· The case study demanded more research.
C1.3-Priya M S
· Should have elaborated more on the control issues
· The problems are addressed in a very crisp way and a detailed explanation would have sufficed the requirement.
C2.1-Raghavendra K C
· Very few points regarding how traditional business can compete with the digital economy.
· Good explanation on how the digital economy hampers the traditional real estate business.
· Late submission.
C2.2-Rajani B.V
· Just mentioned “Differentiation strategy” as a solution, where elaboration was needed as to in what way differentiation could actually be made?
· In the 3rd point of the 2nd question proper comparison has not been made on Wal Mart and Sear holdings.
· You have suggested what steps Wal Mart should have taken which are unnecessary.
C2.3-Rajavardhan K.G
· The justification done to the answers is neat.
· Good thinking where you support that daemon customer are a boon.
· The point where you specify the creation a new database to offer discounts and other offers is not satisfactory and needs more justification on the same.
C2.4-Raksha.J
· Detailed description is provided along with market situation which is a plus point.
· Second question is focused mainly from the HR perspective more than from IT perspective where you could have included points like employment of hidden cameras in warehouses, proper billing method etc;
· The URL from where the statistics or the figures were drawn had to be mentioned in the post.
C2.5-Rakshita Shetty
· Very good and detailed explanation has been provided on the case.
· The answer not only speaks about the current status but also brings in historical facts that support the statements
· Conclusion part which is included is a good idea.
· It would be better if the answers were presented point wise.
C3.1-Rashmi Kamat
· Interpretation of first question is not accurate and justice has not been done to the question.
· The third question is also not properly answered and the case required more research to be done on the same.
· More detailed answers are required.
C3.2-Raunak Kumar Bairoliya
· Presentation is good.
· First question is answered well and is well supported.
· Could have elaborated more on each individual point.
C3.3-Rishikesh Borkotoky
· The case study is particularly on e-bay, but the statements have been made on general internet shopping.
· Should have supported better before you made a statement telling that you wouldn’t purchase products from e-bay.
C3.4-Rohit Ranjan Rai
· Submission of wrong assignment and late submission of the correct one.
· Answers are well presented with the key points.
· URL’s are included in the post which is a good thing.
C3.5-Roopavani.R
· Elaboration should have been made on the advantages and disadvantages.
· Mentioned the required key points.
· Good presentation
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
C4.1-Sahana.P
· Explanation has been provided in detail as to how data is going to affect the different departments in the organization.
· Good presentation.
· Has substituted her answer with an example (satyam) which is good thing and proves that fairly good amount of research has been done on the case.
C4.2-Sai Janaki Tejaswi P
· Fairly good amount of research has been done on the topic
· Detailed explanation for the second question and a conclusion would have served the answer better.
· The first question is well answered taking examples on the same.
C4.3-Salman Baig A
· Answers are very crisp.
· More elaboration is needed on the key points as well.
· Good presentation.
C4.4-Satchidanand Das
· Should have been clearer regarding the personal view point in the first question.
· Detailed explanation has been provided regarding impact of Pro Cube software and production and distribution.
C4.5-Sharath Babu
· More explanation would have made the answers better.
· Answers are brief and to the point.
· Avoid spelling mistakes.
C5.1-Shivam Dubey
· No proper construction of sentences.
· Points provided needed more explanation and justification as to how it would improve the decision making.
· Has not spoken on the problem clearly as to the ways of finding information to put in the portal and formatting the information in the portal.
C5.2-Shreyas V
· The first question is answered directly by taking most of the points directly from the text.
· Could have added additional points to support the first answer.
· Should have highlighted more on security and privacy issues instead of stressing on the requirement of VoIP.
C5.3-Shruthi.K.N
· Presentation is not good. Unnecessary use italics, bold could have been avoided.
· The good part of the answer is the brief description about the company that has been included in the beginning, which is a good way of answering the question.
· Has justified well as to why blogging is good news.
· Another good thing is that the answer is substituted with a conclusion.
C5.4-Shruthi Raghavan
· Answers are crisp and to the point.
· It would be better if the answer was explained taking the case study example instead of telling in general terms.
· Could have added more points on benefits.
· Should have mentioned few negative points regarding the collaboration with the customers which would have served the answer better.
C5.5-Siddesh S
· Hasn’t fully explained the advantages of having a common core of information where there is a lot of scope for explanation.
· Research has not been done on the case.
· Could have included the points such as prevention of duplication of work, strategic planning etc; which would have served the answer better.
C6.1-Siddharth Surana
· Good presentation.
· Detailed explanation is provided regarding impact of technology on the diamond industry.
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
· Answer is substituted with a good conclusion.
C6.2-Soumya V N
· No proper justification is being done on the points such as “Enables superior customer service, growth opportunity”.
· A lot more points could have been touched upon such as better customer knowledge about the product.
· No proper research has been made regarding the disadvantages.
· Good presentation.
C6.3-Sriniketan G S
· Though you have spoken about the advantages of online transaction, he has failed to look upon the disadvantages such as security issues regarding the online banking transactions.
· Very few points regarding the advantages of check writing.
· Answers are brief and to the point.
· No proper construction of sentences.
C6.4-Sudhanshu Kumar
· The points need more elaboration.
· The answer for the second question needs to be supported with examples i.e. proper justification is needed.
C6.5-Suma P
· It is good that the law point regarding trademark has been stated before justifying your answer which support your answers well.
· More points should have been included from Microsoft’s viewpoint for justification.
· Detailed explanation is needed on the second question, and the answer is stated on general terms.
· More research on the topic is needed.
C7.1-Surakshith B
· The answer is justified in a good manner by taking examples (Bangalore Police)
· The second answer could be better explained regarding the privacy and ethical issues.
· Good presentation.
C7.2-Tejus R
· The case is started off by providing an introduction about the UPS which is a good thing.
· Well presented answers.
· Key points are provided wherever necessary and explained as well/
C7.3-Vijaya Kumar K
· Good presentation.
· Fairly good amount of research on the case is required.
· The second answer demands a more detailed explanation.
C7.4-Nithin K V
· Writer has a clear stand on the topic.
· More explanation is required as to why it is a good strategy in the second answer.
C7.5-Bhawnani Poonam Ram
· Very crisp answers.
· Key points are highlighted.
· More research was needed on the case.
C8.1-Amith Nayaka T E
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
· There are a lot of variations in the font and presentation style which should have been avoided.
· Poor language usage.
· Detailed answers are provided for the questions which is a good thing.
C8.2-Arpith U K
· First question is answered well and fairly good amount of research has been done on the same.
· Better usage of language is required.
C8.3-Chaitra T R
· Answers are well presented with clear explanations for the same.
· Unnecessary points in the first answer could have been avoided to make the answer much better.
C8.4-Janardhan C
· Answers are descriptive which is good.
· Better presentation is required.
C8.5-Karthik K
· Good presentation.
· Key points are well written.
· More detailed answers would have done better justice to the case however.
C8.6-Padma B S
· It is good that some facts about the company are provided initially.
· Meanings of the terms EDI and Data synchronization is mentioned before providing the relationship among them which is good.
C9.1-Prashant
· Most of the sentences in the answer are directly drawn from the text.
· Instead a detailed research could have been made on the case before answering.
· Presentation is also not up to the mark.
C9.2-Prashant S Maski
· Fairly good amount of research has been done on the topic.
· Detailed answers are provided to the questions with proper justification.
· Unnecessary points could have been removed.
· Proper conclusion on the topic is needed which is from the user’s point of view.
C9.3-Renuka A Jadhav
· It would be good if the answers were presented in a better manner with a bigger font size.
· More explanation is needed on the second answer as well.
C9.4-Sagar K V
· The first answer is well written and provides a clear stand on the answer.
· It would be better if more research would have been made on the second part of the answer.
· Better presentation is required.
C9.5-Sharath S
· It would have been better if answers were explained in a more detailed manner by providing suitable examples.
C10.1-Swetha M
· Late submission.
· First question is answered well and a good amount of research has been made on the same.
· Could have added more points regarding the relationship between project management and system development.
C10.2-Shreyas D
· Problem is well understood and answers are well presented.
· Good research work has been done on the case.
C10.3-Priyonath Banerjee
· Looks confused as the writer starts off saying 4 years wasn’t a long term to wait but the same time concludes saying that it was a huge risk taken by FBI.
· Proper solution hasn’t been provided.
C10.4-Shilpa.S
· Not submitted.
C10.5-Vijay S S
· Good amount of research has been done on the case
· The answers are not only well written but also justified.
Chapter End Case Studies
C1-Sushma Rao
· The writer seems to be in a dilemma and does not stand by her answer.
· The question was to say what Albertson were developing but the answer is suggestive stating what should have been done.
· More detailed answers were required.
C2-Trishanth
· The first question is answered well.
· Each and every IT strategy has been explained and justified as to why they are successful.
· The answer is however too short to draw a conclusion.
C3-Uttamani Hitesh Chandralal
· Explanation is needed as to in what ways the transactions of the corporate is similar to those of the universities.
· The importance of the information security in universities has not been stressed.
· There are statistics that are provided but the source is not included in the post.
· The second question is answered well and is clear in opinions.
C4-Vatsal Doshi
· Very less research has been done on the case.
· Most of the sentences are directly drawn from the text.
· It would be better if the answers were presented point wise.
C5-Vijetha P C
· A good research work has been made on the case before answering.
· The first is supported with facts to prove that in store advertising isn’t annoying.
· The answers are substituted with a good conclusion.
· The source from where the facts and figures are drawn should have been specified.
· Questionnaire table that has been included is indeed an innovative idea.
C6-Vinith J
· Well explained answers which show that the case is clearly understood by the writer.
· The writer has done a good research done on the case before answering.
· Could have improvised on the presentation.
C7-Vishal Agarwal
· Good presentation style.
· Answers are well justified.
· Solution 2 could have included better convincing points.
C8-Vivek Kumar Mishra
· Detailed explanation has been provided for both questions.
· Good amount of research is being done on the topic.
· The writer has substituted the answers with images as well which is a good thing.
· The second answer is well presented regarding what can be done to increase the customer experience.
· The source of information has been included in the post which is required.
C9-Yeshwant Singh
· Answers could have been presented in a better way.
· Detailed explanation has been given along with suitable examples.
C10-Yukteshwaradithya Singh Parihar
· A thorough research has been made on the case before answering.
· Good presentation.
· The answers are well explained.
Internet Activities
IA1, 2 -Alireza Khakpour
· Late submission.
· Incomplete assignment.
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
· Most of the answers are directly copied from web.
IA3, 4 -Baharan Asghari
· Not submitted
IA5, 6 -Darshan Thapa
· Source from where the information is drawn is mentioned in the post.
· The opinion of the writer is stated well.
· Some of the questions are left unanswered.
IA7, 8 -Hamidreza Habibi Shandiz
· A good amount of research has been done.
· All the questions are answered in detail, but most of the contents are directly copied from web.
· Proper presentation is needed.
· Answers are presented like raw data without proper filtering of the required statements.
IA9, 10 –Malihe Mohammadi
· Not submitted.
Problem Solving Activities
PSA1-Mohamma Reza Radan
· Incomplete answers.
· More detailed answers would have made better justice to the questions.
· Answers are too short and comprehensive.
· Proper presentation required.
PSA2- Mohsen Fasihi yazdi
· Answers are not well presented.
· Most of the answers are directly drawn from web and presented even without proper formatting.
PSA3- Mohammad Askari Jirhandeh
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
· The answers should have been presented in a better way.
· Proper justification is needed on a few questions.
· Point wise presentation would have been better.
PSA4-Vinay Das K
· Answers are presented well by using table for comparison.
· More research could have been done on the topic.
· More detailed answers were required for some questions.
PSA5- Samarth Manu
· Usage of tables is a good way of presenting the answer.
· Incomplete assignment.
· Could have condensed the answer by removing all the irrelevant points.
PSA6-Shahab Sadeghi
· All questions are answered in detail.
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
PSA7- Gautham Kumar
· Could have applied more thinking while answering the questions instead of drawing the details directly from web.
· Some answers are unnecessarily long.
· Incomplete answers.
PSA8-Syed Ahmed Mohiuddin Peerzade
· Well presented answers along with proper justification for the same.
· Lack of personal view.
· Better presentation style is required.
· Proper justification provided for the questions not answered.
PAS9-Rishabh Asthana
· Unnecessary points could have been avoided to make the answers better.
· Fairly good amount of research has been done.
PSA10-Masadur Rahaman
· Incomplete assignment
· Proper presentation of the answers is required.
Comments (0)
Post a Comment