IS evaluation submitted by Zeshta Bhat

0

CASE STUDY NUMBER

COMMENTS
C1.1
·         Not very creative, seems bookish.
C1.2
·         Can work on presentation
·         Can expect more creativity
C1.3
·         Seems a little confused
·         Does not take one stand on customization
C2.1
·         Must work on presentation
·         Can be more creative
C2.2
·         No original idea,existing solutions
·         Differentiation strategy not well explained
C2.3
·         Not very innovative
·         Should work on presentation
C2.4
·         Answer well written
·         Copied the first paragraph from a copyright protected sorce
C2.5
·         Very well explained
·         Great use of words
·         But tends to get a little general
C3.1
·         Can work more on content
C3.2
·         Content is bookish
C3.3
·         Can come up with more information on the topic
C3.4
·         Could research more
·         Well  presented
C3.5
·         Content is good
·         Is creative
C4.1
·         Detailed
·         Well presented
C4.2
·         Answer is precise
·         Scope for more creativity
C4.3
·         Could have researched more
C4.4
·         Could have researched more
C4.5
·         Not clear,brief
C5.1
·         Little irrelevant especially first question
C5.2
·         Well presented
·         Well  explained

C5.3
·         Quite informative
C5.4
·         Could have researched more
C5.5
·         Topic  defined  briefly
C6.1
·         Very  well  presented
·         Quite informative and creative
C6.2
·         Topic presented well
·         Could explain the disadvantages better
C6.3
·         Is  reaonable
·         Could research more
C6.4
·         Second answer not very clear
C6.5
·         Could be more elaborated
C7.1
·         Can present more solutions to the problem defined
C7.2
·         Could be more concize
·         Quite informative and technical
C7.3
·         Understanding is good
·         Can explain his Second answer much better supporting his stand
C7.4
·         Interesting
·         Has come up with something new and innovative
C7.5
·         Has answered the first question well
·         Could have shown innovation for the second one
C8.1
·         Answer is good
·         Can come up with more
C8.2
·         Should work on his presentation
·         First answer seems convincing
C8.3
·         Informative
·         Could explain ERP better
C8.4
·         Could be more informative
C8.5
·         Answers are precise and apt
·         Could have concluded better
C8.6
·         The post is reasonably good
C9.1
·         Presentation and use of words could be better
C9.2
·         Could come up with more
C9.3
·         Understanding of the topic is good
·         Can include more points.
C9.4
·         Depicts clear understanding and stand
·         Should  work little on presentation
C9.5
·         Very brief
·         Answer not clear
C10.1
·         Could  be more accurate
C10.2
·         Can come up with more information
C10.3
·         Answer is  good
·         Could explain the second question better
C10.4
·         Not submitted
C10.5
·         Answers are very technical and clear
·         Proctor and Gambles point of view not discussed
C1
·         Answer is  brief
·         Should include more information
C2
·         Answer is  brief
·         Can come up with more
C3
·         Could explain little more about transactions in universities
C4
·         Could research more on the topic
C5
·         Well  explained and presented
C6
·         Double Play auction explained well
·         Could explain the second question better
C7
·         Could come up with more points
C8
·         Very informative
·         But could  be  concized
C9
·         Relationship between DSS application in production and sales could be explained better
C10
·         Understanding  is good
·         Could be more precise
IA1,2
·         Well  researched and informative
·         But not complete
IA3,4
·         Not submitted
IA5,6
·         Very  informative
·         But incomplete
IA7,8
·         The post is  reasonable
·         Many questions to be answered
IA9,10
·         Not submitted
PSA1
·         Could research more
·         Answer is incomplete

PSA2
·         Answer supported numerically
·         Third answer is incomplete
PSA3
·         Post depicts a clear understanding
·         Can work better on presentation and use of words
PSA4
·         Answer is not very clear
·         Incomplete
PSA5
·         Lot of irrelevancy
·         Last answer is clearly written
PSA6
·         Answer is too technical
·         The post is quite informative
PSA7
·         Could come up with more for the second question
·         Answer is incomplete
PSA8
·         Got some errors while typing some URL’s
·         Explanation is reasonably good
·         The working procedure of vijaya bank is well explained and researched
·         The comparison between vijaya bank and lending tree is really well written
PSA9
·         Should work on presentation
·         Answer not clear
PSA10
·         Answers are too technical,no clear stand
·         Incomplete

Comments (0)

Post a Comment